When the language camp ends, it
means one assignment crossed. Thus, I felt relieved that the camp was over.
However, I learnt a lot from it. I am grateful that I have the chance to see the
reality of Malaysian students and its learning culture.
Although I am not one of the facilitator,
I do observe how the students learn, their feedbacks and their participation.
It frustrates me that most of the students are passive learners; dependent, shy
to speak out their opinion and did not want to do the thinking at all. There
are even weak students who can’t write in English at all that they just copy
the instruction during the tandem writing. As consequences, the facilitators
have to create the cheers for the students, draw the logo for them as well as
coming out with the ideas and the script for the drama. It is not too much to
say that most of the outcomes of the activities are all done by the
facilitators. In fact, they are not guiding, but they are doing it for them. However,
it is unfair to deny that there are students who participate, give ideas and really
contribute in the games though they are minority. I adore students who show
their interest and determination in all games especially in presenting the
drama.
In
future, for the next language camp, there are several things need to be
improved. It is vital to consider the target learners’ proficiency level before
constructing the games. Time for each games should be lengthened as facilitators
need more time to explain the instruction, give examples and trigger student’s
participation and thinking before they could really play the games.
That's right Izyana. Time management is really important for any program especially when handling school students.
ReplyDelete